Imagine a tale where David doesn't just face a single Goliath, but a multitude of them, stretching across the arid landscapes of 'Indian diplomacy'
A Fugitive Offender, the De facto Head of Abu Dhabi, UAE, you have the Sword of Damocles hanging over your head at every moment! ...'24th Year'
Mohammed Bin Zayed, Head of the UAE Federation, Is a 'Fugitive From Law', despite a series of UAE and India Judicial Decisions!...'25th Year'
The Highest Level of Warning against the De facto Head of Abu Dhabi, UAE, who is hiding behind the doctrine of State Sovereignty!...'Brochure'
Picture a story where David doesn't just face a single Goliath, but a multitude of them, stretching across the boundless oceans and the arid landscapes of Indian diplomacy. This narrative isn't the spine of an enthralling fiction book; it unfolds the true journey of an NRI (Non-Resident Indian) entrepreneur entangled in a legal maze that cuts across borders and stretches over years. A UAE investor of Indian descent won multiple court verdicts in the UAE in 1996, yet these rulings went unenforced, purportedly due to the influence wielded by the opposing party, namely Mohamed bin Zayed, the current President of the UAE.
In search of justice, he appealed to the Indian courts, seeking to enforce these judgments and to reclaim his business assets worth more than 100 million US dollars. The NRI businessman faced formidable obstacles in implementing the UAE court decisions, casting a spotlight on the systemic challenges within the Union Government and the ministry of external affairs. Despite orders from the Indian courts instructing the Government of India to coordinate with UAE authorities, there has been a lack of action over the past 27 years.
The unyielding effort of the NRI businessman to uphold the UAE court's decisions highlights the urgent need for effective, transparent, and expedient support mechanisms for NRIs in legal battles, as well as the importance of enhanced diplomatic efforts to address such international disputes. Read more information at Abu Dhabi Funds: ‘From The UAE To India, Standing Tall Against The Tides!’
"PLEDGE FOR JUSTICE - THE UAE SEES A RENAISSANCE IN ITS JUSTICE LANDSCAPE!" 🌍⚖️
— The Accidental Patriot! (@JabirOrg) February 12, 2024
In a striking turn of events, Qatar extends mercy while UAE's legal landscape remains parched. Discover the contrast in governance styles between UAE's President Sheikh @MohamedbinZayed Al Nahyan… pic.twitter.com/QUZGqkEAuA
The evasion of legal obligations by the UAE Prince, now the President of United Arab Emirates, has triggered a series of legal consequences, both nationally and internationally. His disregard for valid court rulings, engagement in fraudulent activities, and alleged absconding with assets valued at over $100 million has led to severe ramifications under the legal frameworks of the United Arab Emirates and India.
Under UAE law, the Prince's actions are a clear violation of judicial orders, constituting contempt of court. Additionally, his involvement in fraudulent activities may invoke criminal liabilities, subject to stringent penal measures as prescribed by UAE statutes. It's imperative to uphold the values of justice and accountability, ensuring that no individual, regardless of status or position, remains immune to legal consequences for their actions. Read more on this global campaigns at Abu Dhabi Domains: ‘A New Legal Frontier: Join the UAE-India Judgments For Sale Campaign, Expanding Across the Globe!’
In a world where injustice is not just a word, but a reality, victims of grave crimes such as armed looting, kidnapping, torture, or rape often cannot seek justice through law enforcement. To make matters worse, judgment debtors can easily get away with appalling crimes, such as armed robbery, embezzlement of significant funds, setting fire to valid court decisions against them, and fraudulently avoiding their obligations to judgment creditors.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is not immune to these problems. The seven emirates that make up the UAE include the largest cities of Dubai and Abu Dhabi. Abu Dhabi, which is the federal capital and the largest of the emirates, is where a 'UAE prince' orchestrated the abduction and has gone as far as to murder a judgment creditor in a detention camp with the help of a group of police officers. The victim, a contractor and engineer by profession, was an Indian-origin UAE investor who had won a civil lawsuit against a friend of the prince, that was the reason.
The judgment creditor was threatened with dire consequences if he didn't stop the interim order issued by the federal court in his favour. The next day, intruders ransacked the entire office of the judgment creditor and looted money and valuables from the office locker, which was kept for the distribution of wages for around 300 employees and sub-contractors.
The judgment creditor closed the door and sought intervention from the police, the police came but they protected the trespassers who were the lawbreakers and severely beaten the judgment creditor in cold blood, his left-hand fingers were smashed by policeman with an iron rod of one-meter length they hold. The judgment creditor was threatened to be killed, shackled, kidnapped, and a policeman was shouting “Indian, Pakistani, Bengali, all are thieves and procurers.
The judgment creditor's younger brother was also kidnapped by policemen and brutally tortured in front of him, to force him to sign false confessions to a crime they didn't commit. A policeman in uniform tried to pull out the injured fingernails of the judgment creditor with a primitive type of instrument. The real horror was when they forced him to lie down on the floor and took some rag clothes consisting of a long length and rolled them on his head, covering the entire face, and started hitting and kicking.
As a result of the harrowing torture methods, he was coughing and gasping for breath for a long time. The judgment creditor suffered extreme torture of the worst order at an underground detention camp, leading to his unconscious condition, perilously near-death.
The author of this article is the judgment creditor himself, who experienced this injustice in the UAE. The author was taken to central hospital due to medical emergency as an unconscious patient and he was subsequently thrown into Al Wathba Central Prison in Abu Dhabi. Later, he was falsely accused of "Using force against Government employee and assault". During their year-long detention, the author suffered physical and mental abuse, including prolonged periods of solitary confinement.
When the author finally appeared in court and proved that the police had acted on the orders of the ruling elite, witnesses from different nationalities were called to testify in court. The Legal Court of First Instance had no other option but found the author innocent and ordered their immediate release. However, the UAE government did not release them, and the court's investigation order to strip off the powers of the 'UAE prince' was not enforced.
The prosecution appealed the decision, and while the Apex Court of Abu Dhabi granted bail to the author, they were not released. During a speedy trial, evidence presented in court proved police orchestration and the prosecution's dishonest deals, leading to all culprits pleading guilty, including all policemen and the friend of the 'UAE prince'. The Apex Court dismissed the prosecution's appeal and condemned their conduct, advising the author to sue for all losses and sufferings illegally inflicted upon them while delivering a "Landmark Apex Judgment."
Despite four expeditious judicial awards of Abu Dhabi Courts declaring the author's innocence and exposing the wrongdoing of UAE officials, the UAE government did not restore the author's dignity and rights, or released his funds over $100 million worth of business assets and real estate properties that was fraudulently embezzled. Moreover, the executive continued to violate human rights, the executive defrauded the court's judgment and arbitrarily deported the author as if he was punished for a crime, an attempt to save face, and causing recurrent trauma.
The Enforcement of UAE Judgments Campaign seeks to empower judgment creditors to fight for their rights and hold the UAE government accountable for its actions. By joining the campaign, you can contribute to the ultimate path to victory for judgment creditors in the UAE.
READ MORE CAMPAIGNS: ‘NO ESCAPE FROM JUSTICE; DECLARE VICTORY IN THE FIGHT FOR ACCOUNTABILITY!’
International human rights law lays down obligations which States are bound to respect. By becoming parties to international treaties, States assume obligations and duties under international law to respect, protect, and fulfil human rights. The obligation to respect means that States must refrain from interfering with or curtailing the enjoyment of human rights.
The obligation to protect requires States to protect individuals and groups against human rights abuses. The obligation to fulfil means that States must take positive action to facilitate the enjoyment of basic human rights.
Through ratification of international human rights treaties, Governments undertake to put into place domestic measures and legislation compatible with their treaty obligations and duties. The domestic legal system, therefore, provides the principal legal protection of your human rights guaranteed under international law.
Where domestic legal proceedings fail to address human rights abuses, mechanisms and procedures for individual complaints or communications are available at the regional and international levels to help ensure that international human rights standards are indeed respected, implemented, and enforced at the local level. Regional human rights protection systems also have a crucial role in enforcing international law.
"In 1758 the Swiss jurist Emmerich Vattel expounded the fundamental principle of diplomatic protection when he wrote that “Whoever ill-treats a citizen indirectly injures the State, which must protect that citizen” Read more information on: ‘International Human Rights Law’
The description outlines a situation involving a de facto ruler who exercises power without legal legitimacy, often bypassing formal legal and governmental structures. This ruler's actions, as described, involve a range of criminal behaviors designed to evade the law and manipulate legal outcomes to his advantage. The behaviors include attacking a foreign investor, looting, kidnapping, torture, extortion, framing charges, obstructing justice, and ultimately, deporting the foreign investor fraudulently to evade legal accountability and to retain embezzled assets. Yes, based on the actions described, this person can be called a 'fugitive', even though he may not yet be officially designated as such by international law enforcement agencies. A 'fugitive criminal' is typically someone who flees from jurisdiction or hides to avoid legal processes, especially after committing a crime. In this context, the de facto ruler's efforts to escape legal accountability for his actions — including crimes against an individual, contempt of court, fraud and embezzlement — align with the behaviors of a fugitive criminal. Furthermore, the ruler's actions undermine the rule of law, demonstrating a blatant disregard for legal processes and the rights of individuals. The evasion of legal processes, manipulation of the judiciary, and use of power to commit and conceal criminal activities are hallmark behaviors of individuals who place themselves above the law, often seen in cases of high-level corruption and abuse of power. The international community generally considers such actions not only criminal but also a violation of human rights. Depending on the jurisdiction and the international treaties the country is party to, these actions could also warrant investigation by international legal bodies or human rights organizations, potentially leading to charges of crimes against humanity or other serious international crimes. Read full text: "Invest In Justice, Make Every Judgment Count!"
KHALED AL-HASSEN, a businessman and naturalised US citizen, alleged that he was abducted, taken to a secret location, tortured and forced to sign a false confession while working in the United Arab Emirates. Among the torturers, the suit alleged, were the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan, known in Washington as MBZ, his brother and president of the UAE, Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, and General Saeed Hilal Abdullah al-Darmaki, at one time the minister for interior affairs. "Read more on the torture case brought in federal court in L.A. against the most powerful figures in the Gulf — the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed al Nahyan; the Emir of the UAE, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed al Nahyan"
Enforcement of @UAEJudgments will obviate further #Litigation against #UAE and generate goodwill in the minds of the #Indian citizens, particularly those undertaking enterprises involving massive investments in UAEhttps://t.co/SG3UBwwUqn
— Jabir Org (@JabirOrg) August 2, 2018
[@ABZayed @MOFAUAE @UAEembassyIndia #UN] pic.twitter.com/36ppZN0cTF
"LETTER TO MISSION IN ABU DHABI,"
FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF ‘NON-EXECUTION OF COURT-JUDGMENTS AGAINST EXTORTION, KIDNAPPING, TORTURE ETC., CONTEMPT OF COURTS, "EMBEZZLEMENT OF FUNDS, DEFRAUDING’ AND OTHER OFFENSES BY THE UAE ADMINISTRATION"
"OPEN LETTER TO UAE AMBASSADOR TO INDIA,"
'TO CLAIM DAMAGES FOR NON-ENFORCEMENT OF A SET OF JUDGMENTS OF UAE COURTS & OUTRIGHT FRAUD' ...... "CHANGE UAE's TAINTED IMAGE"
"Marking the 20th Anniversary of the 'Abu Dhabi Police-Looting' in Abu Dhabi, UAE".
"Shop burgled by policeman and his companion Emirati landlord, US$.4m worth money and valuables looted!" Regrettably, the 'Perpetrator' of this 'Heinous Crime' was the 'Executive Branch of Abu Dhabi', whose Ruler at the time was none
other than the late 'Sheikh Zayed', the Emir of Abu Dhabi and absolute Ruler of the UAE; and the 'United Nations' has an obligation to act. ... "Statement on the Occasion
of the '20th Anniversary of Abu Dhabi Police-Looting, UAE"
"Let @UAEfugitive Face the #Law; Avoid Consequences" @MondayTweets!
— Jabir Org (@JabirOrg) August 2, 2018
[#BinZayed #ABZayed #YearofZayed #AbuDhabi #UAE #MEAIndia #PMOIndia #Doha #Qatar #SaudiArabia #IndiaUAE #AlJazeera #QatarNews #YemenWar #Mercenarism #Arabtimes #RexTillerson #TheIntercept #PoliceLooting #UAEICJ] pic.twitter.com/W3rsihAljj
DONATE for ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’. Human Rights are the foundation of freedom, justice and peace, and are the basic standards without which people cannot live a life of dignity. Discrimination is an abuse which prevents people from enjoying their basic human rights, and thus undermining the very concept of a universal right. The ‘International Law' is fairly clear that the governments have a duty of ratifying human rights treaties and mechanisms, focused on the recognition of victims’ rights and dignity; their protection and promotion is the first responsibility of States, in doing so, commit to meeting certain human rights obligations of the states. Unlike all other regions, the establishment of regional inter-governmental Human Rights mechanisms, to date, a mechanism to enable individuals to seek redress, has not been created between India and its neighbouring countries. Full Text: ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms Timeline' Highlighting Submissions & Responses, Government of India.
Like Us | Follow Us: "Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks" is the best 'Social Impact Investment Model for Justice''. Don't let fraudsters remain in the shadows - Expose & Protest! 'Tell Your Friends To Support Justice In The UAE'... "Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks"
Mindful, in particular, that a judgment debt is hanging over the Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates. The Judgment is binding and enforceable by the court of Abu Dhabi from where the ruling came from. The Judgment debt of Abu Dhabi, can be eliminated or satisfied by the enforcement of judgments and legal remedies... How to buy a Judgment? Promotional Campaigns Worldwide
The Judgment of the Apex Court of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, is remarkable in every sense. The Judgment of the final court of appeal is a great example of the importance of honouring and respecting Human Dignity. Unfortunately, the Judgment which was awarded to an Indian businessman, as early as 19-05-1996 is still pending execution... Read More
This is one of our value added, unique business strategy to satisfy legal judgments, to recover his or her rights from the debtors specified in a Judgment. As a lawful owner of a legal Judgment, the victim has the right to offer his Judgment for sale or to make efforts to legally enforce and recover his assets and the inherent rights of individuals to dignity... Link to the FAQ
During the many years I worked for justice and the realisation of human rights around the world, I have seen that both the failure to combat impunity and the denial of justice only served to encourage further serious violations. ... "Navi Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights"...Read More
Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts marks a major step in the codification and progressive development of international law. The topic attributing conduct to the State; defining when there has been a breach of international law and the excuses or justifications for breaches; reparation for injustices, the invocation of responsibility, especially standing of States in the public interest, and the rules relating to countermeasures...Read More
‘Judgment For Sale’ (JFS) is a prospective Internet-based DPO candidate (Direct Public Offerings) who want to raise capital for Social Justice. Join us and explore our unique business strategy to satisfy legal judgments. The investors may convert their contributions into stock (Equity investments) gives them an opportunity to gain from a rise in the share price...Read More
The 'Judgment Creditor' initiated a 'legal cell' in December, 1996 attempting to help torture victims of United Arab Emirates (UAE). Time and again, the organization have received thousands of grievances from migrant workers and members of their families with desperate measures verging on a state of crisis or hopelessness. Different learning platforms and online publications were developed to create awareness and to end the human rights abuses as well as violations of the laws under the authoritarian regime of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates...‘Read Publications’
States as Guardians of the Rights of Individuals
When a State fail to protect individuals from human rights abuses, they are also in violation of international law and therefore incur State responsibility...
Responsibility of States
It is important to recall that the conduct of any State organ is considered to be an act of that State. It should also be kept in mind that ‘successor governments’ remain bound by the acts incurred by the ‘predecessor governments’...Attribution of Conduct to a State
The Authoritarian Regime does not deserve respect
Foreign Office ministers continue to give UAE a cover of respectability the authoritarian regime does not deserve. Human rights are so essential to Britain’s foreign policy objectives that they are part of our DNA.That is what a Foreign Office spokesman said...
International Fight Against Impunity Starts with the Responsibility of States
Persistent failure to enforce court decisions leave victims demoralized and reinforce an existing culture of impunity. In the wake of massive human rights abuses, a society’s demand for accountability..
The EU must be congratulated for its bold move
The European Union has passed a resolution strongly condemning the UAE for its Human Rights violations against the migrant workers and the democratic activists..
UAE statement before the General Debate of the 67th session of the UN
The United Arab Emirates expresses its deep concern about the violence against the Rohingya Muslims community in Myanmar, and calls upon the international community to move towards urging the Government of Myanmar...
